VMD-L Mailing List
From: Brian Bennion (brian_at_youkai.llnl.gov)
Date: Fri Aug 19 2005 - 11:53:55 CDT
- Next message: JC Gumbart: "Re: small figures"
- Previous message: Anna Karawajczyk: "small figures"
- Next in thread: Justin Gullingsrud: "Re: catdcd vs readdcd.h error checking"
- Reply: Justin Gullingsrud: "Re: catdcd vs readdcd.h error checking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Hi John and others,
I have a 3.1GB file generated by namd on a linux cluster Xeon cpus.
Catdcd reads through it and returns the proper number of frames.
catdcd -num file.dcd
gives 2500 frames
However, I tried to load it into vmd and it files before the first frame
with error -4.
Looking at the source code for readdcd.h -4 means a bad read
Diving deeper it seems it could fail with this error at a large number of
points during a dcd read so I don't know where the error is actually
caught.
Is catdcd more tolerant of larger/corupted files than the vmd plugins?
Brian
************************************************
Brian Bennion, Ph.D.
Bioscience Directorate
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
P.O. Box 808, L-448 bennion1_at_llnl.gov
7000 East Avenue phone: (925) 422-5722
Livermore, CA 94550 fax: (925) 424-6605
************************************************
- Next message: JC Gumbart: "Re: small figures"
- Previous message: Anna Karawajczyk: "small figures"
- Next in thread: Justin Gullingsrud: "Re: catdcd vs readdcd.h error checking"
- Reply: Justin Gullingsrud: "Re: catdcd vs readdcd.h error checking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]