VMD-L Mailing List
From: Andrew Dalke (dalke_at_dalkescientific.com)
Date: Wed Mar 05 2008 - 16:32:42 CST
- Next message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: radial distribution function and number integrals"
 - Previous message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: running vmd in parallel"
 - In reply to: Fei Chen: "What's the main reason of the structure or function of a protein?"
 - Next in thread: Fei Chen: "Re: What's the main reason of the structure or function of a protein?"
 - Reply: Fei Chen: "Re: What's the main reason of the structure or function of a protein?"
 - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
 
On Mar 5, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Fei Chen wrote:
> I'm not sure whether it's apt to issue the problem here.
> I assume that there is some forces responsible for the structure or  
> function of a protein.
> I want to find the main reason that result in the structure or  
> function of a protein.
> I can compute the bond-force or non-bond force between two atoms in  
> a protein, should some atoms' force be the most important for the  
> structure or function of the protein? Are bond-force and non-bond  
> force adequate? Or should I take other factors for account?
The answer is "yes to all".
You asked a question which is almost impossible to answer, because  
there's a basic understanding that seems to be lacking in the question.
You need to get an understanding of chemistry first, or of physics.
The forces are that of quantum mechanics, although relativistic  
quantum mechanics is mostly only needed for heavy/metallic atoms.
The approximation made for more organic systems is that nucleons are  
point charges, electrons are "fast", and that the only force to worry  
about is mediated by photons.  That is, electricity and magnetism.
"bonds" are an approximation for how to think about the quantum  
mechanics.  They are useful, but incomplete.  Molecular modeling also  
talks about angle and dihedral forces, van der Waal forces, and  
"normal" electrostatic forces.  Some people talk about aromatics and  
ring currents.  All of these are aspects of the same electromagnetic  
force.
The way that force is expressed differs for different molecules.  All  
molecules have a strong covalent component.  That defines the primary  
structure.  But there's also additional structures caused by other  
modes, like hydrogen bonds in alpha helices and beta sheets.  There's  
a force term caused by the change in entropy around polar proteins,  
which has its own effect.
So the answer is "yes, there are other factors you'll need to take  
into account."  Knowing what those are pretty much describes the  
field of structural biology.
                                Andrew
                                dalke_at_dalkescientific.com
- Next message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: radial distribution function and number integrals"
 - Previous message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: running vmd in parallel"
 - In reply to: Fei Chen: "What's the main reason of the structure or function of a protein?"
 - Next in thread: Fei Chen: "Re: What's the main reason of the structure or function of a protein?"
 - Reply: Fei Chen: "Re: What's the main reason of the structure or function of a protein?"
 - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
 



