VMD-L Mailing List
From: John Stone (johns_at_ks.uiuc.edu)
Date: Mon Feb 22 2010 - 15:41:08 CST
- Next message: Roman Petrenko: "Re: VMD water protein anlysis"
- Previous message: John Stone: "Re: VMD water protein anlysis"
- In reply to: Irene Newhouse: "Probe orientations in ILS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Irene,
The new version of the code takes symmetry of the probe molecule
into account, thereby eliminating redundant orientations whereas the
old version did not. I've asked my colleague Jan Saam (who designed the
the new version of the algorithm) what the best parameters might be now.
Cheers,
John
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:19:56AM -1000, Irene Newhouse wrote:
> I notice that in the Cohen & al paper, 50 probe molecule orientations are
> used, yet the choices 1-6 are all for far fewer. I've also found another
> paper (not Shulten group) that used 400. Is there a consensus as to a
> reasonable number of probe molecule orientations to use?
>
> If I want to use 50, do I simply set orient 50 ?
>
> Thanks!
> Irene
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.
-- NIH Resource for Macromolecular Modeling and Bioinformatics Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology University of Illinois, 405 N. Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 Email: johns_at_ks.uiuc.edu Phone: 217-244-3349 WWW: http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/~johns/ Fax: 217-244-6078
- Next message: Roman Petrenko: "Re: VMD water protein anlysis"
- Previous message: John Stone: "Re: VMD water protein anlysis"
- In reply to: Irene Newhouse: "Probe orientations in ILS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]