VMD-L Mailing List
From: Dennis N Bromley (dbromley_at_uw.edu)
Date: Fri Sep 26 2014 - 11:31:25 CDT
- Next message: Maxim Belkin: "Re: select a group of atoms/distance measurement"
- Previous message: John Stone: "Re: VMD 1.9.2 b1 OptiX Tachyon Error"
- In reply to: Aref Takiden: "Re: merging several pdbs in one file"
- Next in thread: Aref Takiden: "Re: merging several pdbs in one file"
- Reply: Aref Takiden: "Re: merging several pdbs in one file"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Hi Aref,
it might be goofing up if (as discussed above) there are a variable number
of atoms. Try loading it up in pymol, i think it will roll with variable
atoms. If that reads it up ok, then it means you multi-model pdb file is
correct, but the variable atom number is causing problems. If you look at
your multi-model pdb file in a text editor, does it look right? Do you see
all the models that you think you should be seeing?
-denny-
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Aref Takiden <
aref.takiden_at_mailbox.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> @Dennis: sorry for the email yesterday X_x
> However, it didn’t worked either, i.e I got only the half of the frames in
> vmd in spite of that in the collective-pdbs file I find all gathered pdbs--001a11c2bbe82a54b50503fa75b6--
- Next message: Maxim Belkin: "Re: select a group of atoms/distance measurement"
- Previous message: John Stone: "Re: VMD 1.9.2 b1 OptiX Tachyon Error"
- In reply to: Aref Takiden: "Re: merging several pdbs in one file"
- Next in thread: Aref Takiden: "Re: merging several pdbs in one file"
- Reply: Aref Takiden: "Re: merging several pdbs in one file"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]