VMD-L Mailing List
From: Manas Kohli (manaskohli1_at_gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 28 2020 - 19:21:30 CDT
- Next message: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Problem with Residue Based Coarse Grain tutorial"
- Previous message: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Problem with Residue Based Coarse Grain tutorial"
- In reply to: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Problem with Residue Based Coarse Grain tutorial"
- Next in thread: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Problem with Residue Based Coarse Grain tutorial"
- Reply: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Problem with Residue Based Coarse Grain tutorial"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Dear Peter,
Thank you for your email. It was actually an issue to do with VMD
versioning. The tutorial files are unable to run on VMD 1.9.4 or psfgen
2.0. I reinstalled VMD 1.9.3 and can now run the tutorial files properly. I
then tried to apply it to a new system to do with a voltage gated sodium
channel which was my initial goal for the CG simulation. When I ran the
simulation the minimisation worked initially but the simulation crashed due
to atoms moving too fast. When I examined the minimization structure and
dcd file it was apparent that the water box contracted too far in so parts
of the protein were sticking out which I think causes the simulation to
fail. My structure is rather large and I would require a larger coarse
grain water box than the one provided in the tutorial files. Could you
please help me with this? I think this would be the last issue before I
could run the CG simulation for my channel.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Manas
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:02 PM Peter Freddolino <petefred_at_umich.edu> wrote:
> Can you please redirect the stdout and stderr from those steps to files
> and send them? Let's focus on the VMD1.9.3 machine. Have you ever
> installed a 1.9.4 alpha on that machine? The psfgen version bundled with
> vmd 1.9.3 should be 1.6.4 I believe, so I'm worried about where that
> message about psfgen 2.0 is coming from.
> Thanks,
> Peter
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:11 AM Manas Kohli <manaskohli1_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Peter,
>>
>> Thank you for your reply. I have a linux computer with VMD 1.9.3 and
>> another freshly built computer with VMD 1.9.4 (new version of Ubuntu also)
>> and am getting the same error on both computers. When I execute the scripts
>> for either the POPC or M2 channel example, it initially runs until the fix
>> tcl script (typically until step 2). After that during the solvate step I
>> get:
>>
>> version conflict for package "psfgen": have 2.0, need 1.4
>>
>> and a similar error for solvate. I changed the version in the script so
>> the tcl script can execute but after this I end up getting the error for
>> the D3B bead I described before. For example:
>>
>> ATOM 20 D3B POPCL 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 -1.00 0.00 L1
>>
>> I'm also happy to send over any files with these so you could take a look
>> but I have changed nothing.
>>
>> Thanks and Best Regards,
>> Manas
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:25 AM Peter Freddolino <petefred_at_umich.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> To get started looking at this, can you please let us know the version
>>> of VMD that you are using? I am not able to reproduce the problem; simply
>>> downloading the tutorial files and running the listed commands from the
>>> tutorial for the M2 example works fine for me using VMD 1.9.3 (64 bit
>>> linux).
>>> Thanks,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 7:54 AM Manas Kohli <manaskohli1_at_gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I have been having troubles running a CG simulation for the examples
>>>> provided for the residue based CG tutorial. The initial lipoprotein example
>>>> works fine but for the M2 channel and POPC membrane patch I am unable to
>>>> run them. Specifically the issue seems to lie with coarse graining the POPC
>>>> lipid itself to do with the D3B bead. psfgen can't seem to assign an atom
>>>> or coordinates for this bead and as a result it sits at position 0. This
>>>> then results in the following error message when running the simulation:
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: Atom 1853 velocity is 4.59989e+15 1.18741e+14 7.46308e+13 (limit
>>>> is 1200, atom 81 of 84 on patch 47 pe 0)
>>>> ERROR: Atom 1879 velocity is 3.4509e+15 -3.417e+15 1.32714e+13 (limit
>>>> is 1200, atom 82 of 84 on patch 47 pe 0)
>>>> ERROR: Atom 1892 velocity is -8.05079e+15 3.29826e+15 -8.79022e+13
>>>> (limit is 1200, atom 83 of 84 on patch 47 pe 0)
>>>> ERROR: Atoms moving too fast; simulation has become unstable (3 atoms
>>>> on patch 47 pe 0).
>>>> Warning: Low global exclusion count! (1536 vs 1752) System unstable
>>>> or pairlistdist or cutoff too small.
>>>> ERROR: Exiting prematurely; see error messages above.
>>>>
>>>> Any other membrane protein embedded in POPC seems to fail because of
>>>> the same reason. I'm wondering how exactly to solve this issue with POPC
>>>> for CG simulations.
>>>>
>>>>
- Next message: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Problem with Residue Based Coarse Grain tutorial"
- Previous message: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Problem with Residue Based Coarse Grain tutorial"
- In reply to: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Problem with Residue Based Coarse Grain tutorial"
- Next in thread: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Problem with Residue Based Coarse Grain tutorial"
- Reply: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Problem with Residue Based Coarse Grain tutorial"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]