VMD-L Mailing List
From: Mandayam Bharathi, Harsha (mandayambharathi.1_at_buckeyemail.osu.edu)
Date: Wed Mar 03 2021 - 12:03:25 CST
- Next message: John Stone: "Re: Redundant entries in force field parameters generated by paratool plugin in VMD"
- Previous message: Ranabir Majumder: "Re: Fwd: Problem with QwikMD analysis"
- Next in thread: John Stone: "Re: Redundant entries in force field parameters generated by paratool plugin in VMD"
- Reply: John Stone: "Re: Redundant entries in force field parameters generated by paratool plugin in VMD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Hello everyone,
I was attempting to parametrize Kanamycin A molecule using the paratool plug-in in VMD 1.9.4. After the gaussian calculations were performed, this plug-in was used to generate the kan_A.par file. The issue I am having is that there are multiple values of force field parameters for the same kind of bond, angle, dihedral, etc. For example, this is a section from the parameter file that was generated:
! Parameters for components KAN
! To be used in combination with:
! par_all36_cgenff.prm
! par_all36_lipid.prm
! par_all36_na.prm
! par_all36_prot.prm
BONDS
!
!V(bond) = Kb(b - b0)**2
!
!Kb: kcal/mole/A**2
!b0: A
!
!atom type Kb b0
!
CG321 NTL 207.761 1.4942
CG311 NTL 306.760 1.4719
CG311 NTL 352.721 1.4618
CG311 NTL 280.483 1.4903
NTL HGP5 357.470 0.9998
NTL HGP5 350.040 1.0003
NTL HGP5 363.272 1.0001
NTL HGP5 426.933 0.9997
NTL HGP5 293.770 0.9995
NTL HGP5 359.689 1.0001
NTL HGP5 345.829 1.0000
NTL HGP5 266.656 1.0000
NTL HGP5 329.161 1.0000
NTL HGP5 395.012 0.9999
NTL HGP5 428.309 0.9994
NTL HGP5 410.271 1.0001
OG311 HN5 304.132 1.0001
OG311 HN5 371.604 1.0004
OG311 HN5 346.415 0.9999
OG311 HN5 398.865 0.9998
OG311 HN5 239.699 1.0000
OG311 HN5 365.149 1.0003
OG311 HN5 375.808 0.9997
In the above example NTL HGP5 bond parameter has 12 different values. When I use this file to run a NAMD simulation, it takes the last value by default as it overwrites every time it finds an entry. The simulation is running fine, but I am not sure if this is the correct way to do it. I would really appreciate if anyone else who has faced similar issues, could provide suggestions to find a way around this.
Thanks
Harsha
- Next message: John Stone: "Re: Redundant entries in force field parameters generated by paratool plugin in VMD"
- Previous message: Ranabir Majumder: "Re: Fwd: Problem with QwikMD analysis"
- Next in thread: John Stone: "Re: Redundant entries in force field parameters generated by paratool plugin in VMD"
- Reply: John Stone: "Re: Redundant entries in force field parameters generated by paratool plugin in VMD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]