VMD-L Mailing List
From: toshiaki.tomimori_at_uniadex.co.jp
Date: Mon Aug 08 2022 - 02:59:23 CDT
- Next message: Efthymiou, Christos: "Hetero Chain not Recognized by Structure Manipulation Window"
 - Previous message: John Stone: "Re: Multi-core CPU does not work with VMD."
 - In reply to: John Stone: "Re: Multi-core CPU does not work with VMD."
 - Next in thread: John Stone: "Re: Multi-core CPU does not work with VMD."
 - Reply: John Stone: "Re: Multi-core CPU does not work with VMD."
 - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
 
Hi, John,
 I'm very glad to hear your reply.  I'd concerned I might have to use Vulkan API, but I was not really sure wheather I have to or not.  Now, I would try to use Vulkan and 1.9.4 environment or just give up to use mutithreading in my VMDs'...  Well, thanks anyway, I may report you if I try to check multithreading.
Best,
 Toshiaki Tomimori
-----Original Message-----
From: John Stone <johns_at_ks.uiuc.edu> 
Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2022 3:34 PM
To: Tomimori Toshiaki <toshiaki.tomimori_at_uniadex.co.jp>
Cc: vmd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: vmd-l: Multi-core CPU does not work with VMD.
Hi,
  If you're just watching the CPU load during interactive OpenGL rendering, you're only going to see a single CPU core get used, because OpenGL is an inherently single-threaded API.  OpenGL doesn't do well with multithreading in a single context, and this is one of the reasons for the new Vulkan API. 
Most of the things that invoke multithreading in VMD are very compute-intensive calculations.  The more recent VMD 1.9.4 builds make greater use of multithreading also.  
If you have more specific questions about the use of multicore CPUs in VMD, let me know.  Just be ware that OpenGL isn't the thing to try and measure for this sort of thing.
Best,
  John Stone
  vmd_at_ks.uiuc.edu
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 11:10:01AM +0000, toshiaki.tomimori_at_uniadex.co.jp wrote:
>    Subject: Multi-core CPU does not work with VMD.
> 
> 
> 
>    Hi, can anyone advise me to solve  these?  Just wondering this is not  the
>    VMD work usually.
> 
> 
> 
>    This is what I'm considering using VMD with VMware and NVIDIA vGPU.
> 
>    The GPU used is NVIDIA A40 and the vGPU profile is nvidia_a40-8q.
> 
>    There are doubtful points when  I try how the VMD  work on VDI.  If  these
>    are not the usual behaviors, I would like to know how to solve these.
> 
> 
> 
>    The combinations evaluated are as follows:
> 
>    VMD version 1.9.3 + RHEL 8.4
> 
>    VMD version 1.9.3 + RHEL 7.9
> 
>    VMD version 1.9.4 + RHEL 7.9
> 
>    There are the same results to me, in all conditions.
> 
> 
> 
>    Looks like CPU is single core processed.
> 
>    I used MD  sample data  of just  one million  atoms.   I set  to "VDW"  as
>    "Drawing Method of  Graphics", the drawing  performance was  significantly
>    slower.  In  the "top" command  confirmed on  the RHEL side,  the load  is
>    leaned only to "Cpu6".
> 
> 
> 
>    
> ======================================================================
> ==========
> 
>    %Cpu0  :  0.0 us,  0.4 sy,  0.0 ni,  99.6 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu1  :  0.0 us,  0.0 sy,  0.0  ni,100.0 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu2  :  0.0 us,  0.4 sy,  0.0 ni,  99.6 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu3  :  0.0 us,  0.0 sy,  0.0  ni,100.0 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu4  :  0.0 us,  0.0 sy,  0.0  ni,100.0 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu5  :  0.0 us,  0.0 sy,  0.0  ni,100.0 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu6  : 99.6 us,  0.4 sy,  0.0 ni,   0.0 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu7  :  0.4 us,  0.4 sy,  0.0 ni,  99.3 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu8  :  0.0 us,  0.4 sy,  0.0 ni,  99.6 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu9  :  0.4 us,  0.0 sy,  0.0 ni,  99.6 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu10 :  0.0 us,  0.4 sy,  0.0 ni,  99.6 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu11 :  0.0 us,  0.0 sy,  0.0 ni,100.0  id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu12 :  0.0 us,  0.0 sy,  0.0 ni,100.0  id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu13 :  0.0 us,  0.0 sy,  0.0 ni,100.0  id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu14 :  0.0 us,  0.0 sy,  0.0 ni,100.0  id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    %Cpu15 :  0.0 us,  0.0 sy,  0.0 ni,100.0  id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
>    0.0 st
> 
>    KiB Mem  :  12135108  total,    8341144 free,    2587752  used,    1206212
>    buff/cache
> 
>    KiB Swap:  6160380 total,  6160380 free,        0 used.  9199748 avail Mem
> 
>    
> ======================================================================
> ===========
> 
> 
> 
>    According to the  "VMD version 1.9.3  user guide", VMD  also supports  GPU
>    acceleration using CUDA, and takes  advantage of both multi-core CPUs  and
>    GPUs for  acceleration  of electrostatics.    I thought  the  load  should
>    balanced to multi CPUs, but it seems  like not.  Can anyone advise me  the
>    setting for making be balanced the load to multi CPUs?
> 
> 
> 
>    Multi-core CPU and GPU acceleration:
> 
>    https://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/current/ug/node13.html
-- Research Affiliate, NIH Center for Macromolecular Modeling and Bioinformatics Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology University of Illinois, 405 N. Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/~johns/ http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/
- Next message: Efthymiou, Christos: "Hetero Chain not Recognized by Structure Manipulation Window"
 - Previous message: John Stone: "Re: Multi-core CPU does not work with VMD."
 - In reply to: John Stone: "Re: Multi-core CPU does not work with VMD."
 - Next in thread: John Stone: "Re: Multi-core CPU does not work with VMD."
 - Reply: John Stone: "Re: Multi-core CPU does not work with VMD."
 - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
 



