VMD-L Mailing List
From: Peter Freddolino (petefred_at_ks.uiuc.edu)
Date: Mon Aug 28 2006 - 16:11:11 CDT
- Next message: Guo Zhi: "Re: GLSL failure in VMD 1.8.5, Nvidia 6200 card"
 - Previous message: Pavan Ghatty: "psfgen woes..."
 - In reply to: Pavan Ghatty: "psfgen woes..."
 - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
 
Hi Pavan,
if you have 5 separate chains, you need to split it into 5 separate pdb
files and use a segment statement for each of them. The terminal patches
will only be applied to the very beginning and end of a segment, which
is why your internal terminii are causing problems.
Peter
Pavan Ghatty wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am triying to create psf files using psfgen.
> My input file is
> 
> "package require psfgen
> topology top_all27_prot_lipid.inp
> alias residue HIS HSE
> alias atom ILE CD1 CD
> segment U {pdb newM1-5.pdb}
> coordpdb newM1-5.pdb U
> guesscoord
> writepdb prot.pdb
> writepsf x-plor prot.psf"
> And the output I got was..
> 
> reading residues from pdb file newM1-5.pdb
> extracted 170 residues from pdb file
> Info: generating structure...
> Info: skipping improper N-C-CA-HN at beginning of segment.
> Info: skipping cross-term C-N-CA-C-N-CA-C-N at beginning of segment.
> Info: skipping conformation C-N-CA-C at beginning of segment.
> Info: skipping conformation C-CA-N-HN at beginning of segment.
> Info: skipping bond C-N at end of segment.
> Info: skipping improper C-CA-N-O at end of segment.
> Info: skipping cross-term C-N-CA-C-N-CA-C-N at end of segment.
> Info: skipping conformation CA-C-N-CA at end of segment.
> Info: skipping conformation N-CA-C-O at end of segment.
> Info: skipping conformation N-CA-C-N at end of segment.
> U:1
> U:170
> Info: segment complete.
> reading coordinates from pdb file newM1-5.pdb for segment U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom O1    ALA:34   U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom O2    ALA:34   U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom HN1   GLY:35   U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom HN2   GLY:35   U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom HN3   GLY:35   U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom OT1   ALA:68   U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom OT2   ALA:68   U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom HT1   GLY:69   U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom HT2   GLY:69   U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom HT3   GLY:69   U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom OT1   ALA:102          U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom OT2   ALA:102          U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom HT1   GLY:103          U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom HT2   GLY:103          U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom HT3   GLY:103          U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom OT1   ALA:136          U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom OT2   ALA:136          U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom HT1   GLY:137          U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom HT2   GLY:137          U
> Warning: failed to set coordinate for atom HT3   GLY:137          U
> Info: guessing coordinates for 8 atoms (4 non-hydrogen)
> Info: writing pdb file prot.pdb
> Info: Atoms with guessed coordinates will have occupancy of 0.0.
> Info: pdb file complete.
> Info: writing psf file prot.psf
> total of 2518 atoms
> total of 2542 bonds
> total of 4603 angles
> total of 6649 dihedrals
> total of 454 impropers
> total of 168 cross-terms
> Info: psf file complete.
> 
> The input pdb file had 2530 atoms. psfgen complained about 20 atoms,
> guessed
> 8 of them and ignored the remaining 12 while writing the final pdb file.
> The
> problem as I see it is as follows. The pdbfile contains 5 strands each with
> a NH3+ and COO- terminal groups which would mean the there will be 5 N
> terminals and 5 C terminals. The complaints, however are on all terminal
> N's
> and C's except the first N and the last C termini. I tried separating the
> strands with a TER but no luck.
> I tried both writepsf x-plor and charmm. [ I finally want x-plor psf file
> for a namd run].
> 
> Any help is appreciated.
> 
> Thanks and sorry for my previous question without explanations.
> 
> Pavan.
> 
- Next message: Guo Zhi: "Re: GLSL failure in VMD 1.8.5, Nvidia 6200 card"
 - Previous message: Pavan Ghatty: "psfgen woes..."
 - In reply to: Pavan Ghatty: "psfgen woes..."
 - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
 



